Putting safety first:
a zero tolerance approach to harm

Ashley Almanza, 2017

Delivering world class security for our clients is a complicated business. There are myriad nuances to consider. A thousand little details to address. It requires the precise movement of hundreds of moving parts. However, for all our intricacies, security companies are also rather straightforward. At our core, we are all about our people.

Day in and day out, we rely on our security officers to keep our clients’ people, property, and assets safe from harm. It is our employees that make us the companies we are, which permits the leaders of our industry to rise above the rest. We may be comprised of countless little pieces, but they are our most valuable resource.

So that raises a critical question: Are we taking adequate steps to enhance their safety and health? In other words, are we doing enough to protect the protectors?

We live in tumultuous times. Societies, technology, and the manner of work are all undergoing rapid transformation. These changes have implications for the business, certainly, but they also mean the risks faced by our personnel are evolving. Our safety programmes must keep pace. A safety and health programme that tries to maintain the status quo is almost assuredly moving backward.

Many safety programmes were built, first and foremost, on the need to meet safety and health regulations. But while compliance assurance is a key element in a successful safety and health programme, it is only a baseline. It is merely a starting point. Regulations are often insufficient to protect workers and typically move too slow to keep pace with changes in risk. If a compliance mindset is the primary driver of worker safety and health, one should expect that a gradual degradation in performance is likely to go unnoticed.

To truly advance worker safety and health, safety programmes must focus on goals in addition to regulatory compliance. Programmes must continually move forward, improve, and reflect advances in safety management practice, theory, and controls. They must be flexible, responsive, and continuously measure a variety of indicators of safety performance.

In a mature safety environment, companies should be able to talk about many aspects of safety at once, without fear that any one discussion will dominate or compromise the others. A company should be able to examine injury rates without fear that the company will view it as the only—or even the most important—measure of safety. And companies should be able to talk about individual behaviour and responsibility without it diminishing the importance of organisational cultural issues. All areas are important, and we need to work on them simultaneously. Our people deserve it.

The International Security Ligue is an association of private security organisations responsible for defining, establishing and maintaining the highest ethical and professional standards of the private security industry worldwide.  The current issue of their bi-annual publication is dedicated to the issue of employee safety.

Related Articles
G4S_wins_contract_extension_for_Canadia_air_transport_security Air Canada
Canadian air authority extends security contract
G4S has won a five-year contract extension to provide pre-board, hold-baggage and non-passenger screening services for CATSA.
Employees in a risk operations centre Monitoring risks
Big data, AI and elite analysts; How we're responding to increasing demand for 'always-on' security coverage
Robert Dodge, Executive Vice President for Corporate Risk Services for G4S in the Americas, explains how the company in the region is responding to the growth in demand for specialist security advisors with established operations centres and intelligence led travel risk management capabilities. 
Security guard monitoring employee access control Man leaving a building
Why there are bigger threats to your business beyond cyber attacks
Senior Director of Corporate Risk Services at G4S, Bruce Wimmer explains how business espionage affects organisations of all sizes globally, and what businesses can do to protect their data

.

.

Ashley Almanza, 2017
^